[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates |
Date: |
12 Mar 2001 16:12:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "tailbert" == tailbert <edward> writes:
>> Rather the proper fix seems to have the failing tests include
>> AC_EXEEXT and AC_OBJEXT in their configure.in.
tailbert> Akim, I mean in the general case, even outside of the test
tailbert> cases. On windows platforms, executables get a .exe
tailbert> extension. The problem is, how do you create a proper "make
tailbert> clean", etc. rule? Since there is *already* a hack in
tailbert> automake.in to support EXEEXT until autoconf support for
tailbert> that is released, I suggest putting *another* temporary hack
tailbert> that at least initializes EXEEXT properly on windows
tailbert> platforms. Sure, it's a hack, but hopefully a temporary
tailbert> one.
Yes, but that's the wrongest hack one could imagine :)
tailbert> In general, I agree. There shouldn't be machine dependent
tailbert> code in automake itself, where ever possible. On the other
tailbert> hand, having EXEEXT=\n already pretty much makes it machine
tailbert> dependent.
Yes and no. It's backward compatibility with the Autotools which have
been about *Unix* for a long while, and are now doing some efforts for
non Unices.
Still, I shall repeat myself: to launch the *dignified* handling of
EXEEXT and OBJEXT in Automake (not the Unix centrist default you
changed)), you need to use AC_EXEEXT and AC_OBJEXT in the
configure.in. Then, again, the proper fix for the test failure you
observe consists in fixing configure.in in the *test*.
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, (continued)
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/12
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, edward, 2001/03/12
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/12
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, edward, 2001/03/12
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates,
Akim Demaille <=
- pr19.test, Robert Collins, 2001/03/12
- Re: pr19.test, edward, 2001/03/12
- Re: pr19.test, Robert Collins, 2001/03/12
- Re: pr19.test, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/13
- Re: pr19.test, edward, 2001/03/13
- Re: pr19.test, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/13
- Re: pr19.test, Robert Collins, 2001/03/13
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, Robert Collins, 2001/03/12
- Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/03/13
RE: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates, Robert Collins, 2001/03/13