Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates

[Robert Collins]

----- Original Message -----
From: "edward" <address@hidden>
To: "Akim Demaille" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Akim Demaille" <address@hidden>
> To: "edward" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 6:21 AM
> Subject: Re: ok, new libtool for cygwin updates
>
>
Snip
> > No, we cannot do that.  We precisely issue this line when we have
not
> > seen that AC_EXEEXT was used, so we cannot depend EXEEXT.  We need
to
> > understand why it failed in pr19.  I suppose you are not running
Unix
> > here?
>
> ah, point taken. until autoconf 2.5 is released, how about:
>
<snip>>
> while this patch offends me, at least it will allow testing, etc. to
> continue until autoconf 2.5 comes out.
>
> cheers,
> edward
>

Well as CVS libtool (the point of the exercise :]) depends on CVS
automake & CVS autoconf, I don't think that patch is really needed. We
can just add AC_EXEEXT to configure.in.

Rob