Re: 62-variable-pretty-output.patch

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes:

Akim> There is one test that fails with this patch, but I leave it on
Akim> purpose, because there is a choice to make: is it Makefile.in
Akim> that should be pretty, or is it Makefile?

Neither has to be pretty!

Akim> Hence my question: should we neglect the length of the
Akim> conditions because we consider filling when they are
Akim> AC_SUBST'ed, or we should consider their length before
Akim> substitution for filling?

Really it doesn't matter much to me.


Akim>   * automake.in (&variable_output): Admit a list of @CONDS.
Akim>   (&variable_pretty_output): New.
Akim>   (&define_pretty_variable): Use it.
Akim>   (&read_am_file, &file_contents_internal): Prepend a separator to
Akim>   $am_vars only if there is none yet.
Akim>   (&file_contents_internal): Rename $separator as $spacing to
Akim>   harmonize with &read_am_file.

Ok.

Tom