|
| From: | Tom Tromey |
| Subject: | Re: 76-tags-in-tags-am.patch |
| Date: | 10 Apr 2001 12:35:17 -0600 |
>>>>> "Akim" == Akim Demaille <address@hidden> writes: Akim> Then, I'd say we should have TAGS work all by itself, calling Akim> TAGS-recursive. And tags is nothing but `tags: TAGS'. How does Akim> it sound? Sounds good to me. Tom
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |