automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 82-lang-finish.patch


From: Tom Tromey
Subject: Re: 82-lang-finish.patch
Date: 11 Apr 2001 15:10:07 -0600

Akim> I do share your dislike for the structure, but please, note that
Akim> we are defining methods per _object_.  Cleaner would mean one
Akim> *class* per language, which seems overkill to me.

Tom> Really?  Why?  To me it seems natural.

Akim> Yes, you are right.  But we still have to face the circular
Akim> dependency thingy.  I don't think Automake is ready for this.

Ok.

How hard is it going to be to move from the current object
implementation to the one we really want?

Is it simply a matter of rewriting into classes and then making a
factory to generate the objects for us?  That is, no changes in the
code that manipulates the objects themselves?

If that is the case then I'm more comfortable with the current
approach, since it will flow into the solution we want with relative
ease.

Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]