[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: pr19.test

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: pr19.test
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 22:08:33 +1000

I went to retest this : I couldn't find pr19.test. pr9, yes, pr19, no.

Is it still in HEAD?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Tromey" <address@hidden>
To: "Robert Collins" <address@hidden>
Cc: "edward" <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 3:52 PM
Subject: Re: pr19.test

> >>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden>
> Robert> I recall it failing on openBSD 2.8.
> Cool.
> Now, how can we fix it?
> One idea would be to emit `.PRECIOUS: parse.c'.  However, I don't know
> if that will work with a non-GNU make.  Would that work on OpenBSD?
> (I don't have access to an OpenBSD machine to test it.)
> Another idea would be to emit explicit `parse.c: parse.y' rules for
> every such file.  Would we have to emit the entire rule, or is just
> the dependency enough?  I forget.  If we can just emit the dependency
> then this is probably the best fix.
> Tom

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]