[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder |
Date: |
23 May 2001 15:55:14 -0600 |
>>>>> "Rasmus" == Rasmus Tamstorf <address@hidden> writes:
Rasmus> I think the issue is that with autoconf you setup your
Rasmus> compiler flags (debug / optimized etc) for the entire build
Rasmus> tree when you run ./configure. However, while developing you
Rasmus> may want 90% to be optimized and only the remaining 10% (a
Rasmus> single or a few subpackages) which you are actively debugging
Rasmus> to be build with debuginformation. At least that's an issue I
Rasmus> have ;)
Oh. I never even considered that as a problem. I daily do things
like this:
cd gcc
make mostlyclean
make CFLAGS=-g
Then gcc is built with debugging but the rest of my tree remains
untouched. It is easy, even trivial, to write your package's
configury so that this works.
Tom
- Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Axel Thimm, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Robert Boehne, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Rasmus Tamstorf, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder,
Tom Tromey <=
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Rasmus Tamstorf, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Ralf Corsepius, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Martin Hollmichel, 2001/05/25
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Paul F. Kunz, 2001/05/25
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Peter Eisentraut, 2001/05/23
- Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Tom Tromey, 2001/05/23
Re: Auto-tools & Win32 & Borland C++ Builder, Axel Thimm, 2001/05/24