[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plan for single Makefile
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Plan for single Makefile |
Date: |
31 Jul 2001 00:27:36 -0600 |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
Robert> It shouldn't require that much effort: build a set of rules
Robert> for each target Makefile, and when you add a rule from a
Robert> directory, add it to all the parent directories. Then at the
Robert> end of a single pass you have all the needed rules in all the
Robert> output files.
Yeah, this might be doable. It does mean generating a lot of
Makefiles that we hope nobody will use.
Robert> Surely a similar process is used now for cross-directory
Robert> dependencies?
Right now automake only has a very primitive notion of cross-directory
dependencies. The only ones are hard-coded -- config.status stuff and
also ansi2knr. At least, in the sense I think you mean. Header files
are "handled", but only by adding dummy rules to prevent trying to
rebuild missing headers.
Tom
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, (continued)
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Pavel Roskin, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Michael Poole, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Lars Hecking, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Eric Siegerman, 2001/07/27
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Robert Collins, 2001/07/28
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Eric Siegerman, 2001/07/30
- Re: Plan for single Makefile, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/31
Re: Plan for single Makefile, Tom Tromey, 2001/07/31
Re: Plan for single Makefile, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2001/07/28