Re: Automake 1.6 info files

[Eric Dorland]

* Alexandre Duret-Lutz (address@hidden) wrote:
> >>> "Eric" == Eric Dorland <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> [...]
> 
>  Eric> I've packaged automake-1.6, and the versioned binaries and
>  Eric> directories were a big help. But I'm a bit confused why the info files
>  Eric> are not versioned as well. Was this intentional, or were they
>  Eric> forgotten about? 
> 
> I believe it was not intentional, but simply that nobody really
> cares.  The `*-1.6' binaries are here to help the people doing
> the transition to Automake 1.7 when it come out; not to help
> people stick to Automake 1.6 ad vitam aeternam.  So it doesn't
> make much sense documenting them.
> 

Well is automake 1.7 special in some way? Or well it have versioned
binaries as well?

> [...]
> 
>  Eric> Because right now I either have to split them out into
>  Eric> their own tiny package, or hack them myself to make them
>  Eric> versioned. Any ideas?
> 
> What about renaming the info files from the old versions?

If it were that simple I wouldn't even complain :) But its a bit more
involved then that.

-- 
Eric Dorland <address@hidden>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: address@hidden
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

pgp9cQsEAeD6_.pgp
Description: PGP signature