[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Alternate automake output?

From: Robert Collins
Subject: Re: Alternate automake output?
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 16:04:28 +1000

----- Original Message -----
From: "William Robertson" <address@hidden>
To: "Tom Tromey" <address@hidden>

> I know this is a hack, but could automake play along with this, and
> would this work?  Alternatively, is there a cleaner way to achieve
> goal?

I'd just use subdir_objects and include the full paths to the module
code - much as per the style of 'recursive make considered harmful'.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]