[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?
|
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
|
Subject: |
Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:55:50 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (i386--freebsd) |
Here are the results of my testing:
someconditionals/:
automake-1.5: 249.480u 2.660s 4:42.35 89.3% 0+0k 0+0io 341pf+0w
automake-1.6.3: 341.810u 2.840s 6:07.24 93.8% 0+0k 0+0io 356pf+0w
moreconditionals/:
automake-1.5: 1134.130u 6.730s 21:27.70 88.5% 0+0k 0+0io 615pf+0w
automake-1.6.3: 1199.000u 5.520s 21:45.32 92.2% 0+0k 0+0io 578pf+0w
"someconditionals" uses 24 conditionals and has 632 Makefile.am's.
"moreconditionals" uses 24 conditionals and has 635 Makefile.am's.
It sure looks like I ran these on the same machine, and I doubt the
difference is due to 3 more Makefile.am's...
H