Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sat Aug 31 2002 22:03:25 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• August 31, 2002
  • Re: How not to override existing file, Tom Tromey, 22:03
  • Re: How not to override existing file, Sean MacLennan, 16:59
  • Re: AMDEP does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL, Tom Tromey, 16:31
  • Re: Including header files in shared libraries, Tom Tromey, 16:30
  • Re: How not to override existing file, Tom Tromey, 16:27
  • How not to override existing file, Sean MacLennan, 15:52
• August 30, 2002
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:41
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:32
• August 29, 2002
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Pavel Roskin, 19:10
  • Q: Change from 1.4 to 1.5 of `include' or `:=' interpretation??, David Petrou, 17:21
  • Re: (no subject), Alex Hornby, 06:00
  • Re: (no subject), Akim Demaille, 05:51
  • Re: OBJEXT in implicit rules, Akim Demaille, 05:49
• August 28, 2002
  • AMDEP does not appear in AM_CONDITIONAL, Olefirenko Alexander, 18:36
  • Including header files in shared libraries, Xabier Rodriguez Calvar, 08:05
• August 27, 2002
  • Chicago Meeting Site, Radisson Chicago, 18:46
  • Re: conditional subdir handling, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 14:44
  • Re: conditional subdir handling, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 14:24
  • conditional subdir handling, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 11:54
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Akim Demaille, 06:10
• August 24, 2002
  • Re: auto* overhead, Bruce Korb, 22:32
  • Re: auto* overhead, Tom Tromey, 20:58
  • X on Air Magazine 34: Sale ! $14.50 D-Mode , Red Hot, AV Queen, return, 14:01
  • Re: auto* overhead, Bruce Korb, 13:32
  • Re: [BUG] nasm files are not processed in automake generated Makefiles, Edouard Gomez, 09:47
  • Re: auto* overhead, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:01
  • Re: auto* overhead, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:56
  • Re: [BUG] nasm files are not processed in automake generated Makefiles, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:40
  • auto* overhead, Bruce Korb, 00:22
• August 23, 2002
  • Re: invoking config.status, Raja R Harinath, 23:45
  • false automatically discovered file `foo.c' should not be explicitly mentioned warnings, assar, 23:45
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Pavel Roskin, 21:41
  • invoking config.status, Harlan Stenn, 20:18
  • Re: Install failures are ignored, Tom Tromey, 20:09
  • Re: [BUG] nasm files are not processed in automake generated Makefiles, Kevin Ryde, 18:59
  • Install failures are ignored, Pavel Roskin, 17:52
  • Re: [patch] Another over zealous sanity check, Bruce Korb, 00:42
• August 22, 2002
  • Half Price Cigarettes and Tobacco, Darryl Gotting, 18:34
  • Re: bootstrapping blocksort bombs, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:31
  • bootstrapping blocksort bombs, Bruce Korb, 00:35
• August 21, 2002
  • Re: doco hpux ia64 make trailing backslash, Kevin Ryde, 19:14
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Bruce Korb, 17:00
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 16:53
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Richard Boulton, 16:27
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Bruce Korb, 14:41
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Richard Boulton, 14:09
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Bruce Korb, 13:43
  • Re: Single question FAQ, Tom Tromey, 13:31
  • Re: [patch] Another over zealous sanity check, Tom Tromey, 13:13
  • Re: GNU build system support (autoconf, automake, libtool) for NetWare, Tom Tromey, 13:11
  • Re: PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:36
  • PATCH for "make distcheck" failure, Bruce Korb, 11:28
  • Re: PATCH + What might cause this failure?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:11
  • Re: PATCH + What might cause this failure?, Bruce Korb, 09:51
  • Re: PATCH + What might cause this failure?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:00
• August 20, 2002
  • [BUG] nasm files are not processed in automake generated Makefiles, Edouard Gomez, 19:51
  • GNU build system support (autoconf, automake, libtool) for NetWare, Paul Thomas, 16:22
  • Re: PATCH + What might cause this failure?, Bruce Korb, 15:43
  • Re: Support for new languages, Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez, 06:16
  • Re: object `foo.$(OBJEXT)' created both with libtool and without, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:41
  • Re: libfoo.la is already going to be installed in `lib', Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:31
  • Re: header files, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:26
  • Re: files left after distclean: How to clean those?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:26
  • libfoo.la is already going to be installed in `lib', Harlan Stenn, 00:47
• August 19, 2002
  • object `foo.$(OBJEXT)' created both with libtool and without, Harlan Stenn, 23:58
  • [patch] Another over zealous sanity check, Bruce Korb, 23:14
  • use of .c.cc suffix rule in making bin_PROGRAMS, Ted Irons, 21:43
  • Re: automake & Objective C, Matej Kosik, 17:17
  • Re: vtexi failure, Patrick Welche, 11:43
  • header files, Neal H. Walfield, 11:40
  • Re: vtexi failure, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:15
• August 18, 2002
  • Re: automake & Objective C, Tom Tromey, 18:49
  • automake & Objective C, Matej Kosik, 16:17
• August 17, 2002
  • Re: Support for new languages, Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez, 22:28
  • Re: Parallel builds and SUBDIRS, Tom Tromey, 20:33
  • Re: AC_CONFIG_FILES(whatever) and the $(AUTOMAKE) rule generated by automake?, Tom Tromey, 20:19
  • Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?, Tom Tromey, 19:54
  • Re: Support for new languages, Tom Tromey, 13:26
• August 16, 2002
  • Support for new languages, Rafael Jesus Alcantara Perez, 21:11
  • Verba Volant, request, 09:36
  • question about non-recursive Makefile and subdir_include, Anatoliy Yaroshenko, 04:52
• August 15, 2002
  • Re: slow makefiles are getting even slower, Eric Siegerman, 15:43
  • Re: Problems defining Makefile.am trying to cross-compile for VxWorks on cygwin, Tom Tromey, 14:05
  • Re: myconfig.h in dist, Tom Tromey, 14:02
  • incredibile, bad girls, 12:34
  • Problems defining Makefile.am trying to cross-compile for VxWorks on cygwin, Niklaus Giger, 11:13
  • Re: slow makefiles are getting even slower, Zdenek Kabelac, 11:02
  • Re: about vpath problems, Robert Collins, 10:51
  • Re: slow makefiles are getting even slower, Richard Boulton, 10:14
  • Re: myconfig.h in dist, Waldemar Rosenbach, 07:29
  • Re: slow makefiles are getting even slower, Zdenek Kabelac, 05:59
• August 14, 2002
  • Re: slow makefiles are getting even slower, Tom Tromey, 19:57
  • Re: depcomp for texinfo + automake in guile, Raja R Harinath, 18:27
  • slow makefiles are getting even slower, Zdenek Kabelac, 17:47
  • Re: depcomp for texinfo + automake in guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 16:23
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Tom Tromey, 12:12
  • Re: myconfig.h in dist, Tom Tromey, 12:07
  • Re: Cannot use $(addprefix) in _SOURCES?, Tom Tromey, 12:05
  • Re: about vpath problems, Tom Tromey, 11:59
  • Re: depcomp for texinfo + automake in guile, Tom Tromey, 11:57
  • Re: Processing scripts to handle --program-suffix, Tom Tromey, 11:53
  • Re: listing some files to be build with no optimization?, Tom Tromey, 11:52
• August 13, 2002
  • incredibile, bad girls, 15:46
  • vtexi failure, Patrick Welche, 09:29
• August 11, 2002
  • Please confirm your request to join KinkyGoldCoast, Yahoo! Groups, 23:05
  • 飆車族的苦衷...哈哈哈, yam, 13:03
  • Processing scripts to handle --program-suffix, Ross Burton, 12:11
  • depcomp for texinfo + automake in guile, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 02:00
• August 10, 2002
  • Spanish Stamps 2002, publicidad, 13:19
  • listing some files to be build with no optimization?, mcmahill, 09:43
• August 09, 2002
  • [����] "9,900��" - �̾ & ���Ʈ ��ȹ��!!!, swearing, 05:05
  • Lose Weight and Gain Lean Muscle in 20 Days, JohnAtlas50, 02:09
• August 08, 2002
  • Create a PAYCHECK with your computer!, Stephen, 13:55
  • Re: myconfig.h in dist, Waldemar Rosenbach, 09:38
  • Re: myconfig.h in dist, Respond To List Only, 09:32
  • myconfig.h in dist, Waldemar Rosenbach, 08:03
  • Want a FREE Euro?, latest8605w73, 06:23
  • colon_infile seems wrong..., Harlan Stenn, 00:33
  • AC_CONFIG_FILES(whatever) and the $(AUTOMAKE) rule generated by automake?, Harlan Stenn, 00:27
• August 07, 2002
  • invoking config.status, Harlan Stenn, 21:49
  • automake and multiple inputs for config.status, Harlan Stenn, 21:07
  • Crystal Clear Conference Calls, US Telecenter, 14:31
  • =?big5?B?ZWJ4amVqbyAgUkU6pl7C0KdBt1HByL/address@hidden, orytru, 07:58
  • Cannot use $(addprefix) in _SOURCES?, Ross Burton, 07:32
  • FREE VIVID DVD tstd, FREE DVD, 02:30
  • Hello, I saw your website, Jennifer Kerr, 01:16
• August 06, 2002
  • 好聽ㄉ音樂送給你, dimon, 21:22
• August 05, 2002
  • Re: testing with .so, Waldemar Rosenbach, 10:02
  • Re: testing with .so, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 08:55
  • Re: testing with .so, Waldemar Rosenbach, 08:41
  • (no subject), Unknown, 08:19
  • I Thought You Might Be Interested, hello, 05:03
  • Re: testing with .so and other questions, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 04:17
  • autom4te needs too much memory, Harlan Stenn, 00:03
  • 2.53b change?, Harlan Stenn, 00:00
• August 04, 2002
  • about vpath problems, leiming_xd, 22:25
  • [��������]CU @ K-����! ������ ������..., ������, 14:29
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 05:06
• August 03, 2002
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Harlan Stenn, 23:22
  • 創業轉業工讀新行業超商連鎖加盟, 8, 17:32
  • Place a Banner For Free and Make Money!, Greetings, 16:07
  • Tool to Promote Your Business, Greetings, 12:12
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 03:59
  • Tool to Promote Your Business, Greetings, 03:17
  • (no subject), John, 03:09
• August 02, 2002
  • Place a Banner For Free and Make Money!, Greetings, 21:37
  • [����] 3���� �𿩵� .., HP119, 21:34
  • Huysuz.com (Erotik), huysuzseks, 21:21
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Harlan Stenn, 20:20
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Robert Collins, 20:11
  • Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?, Harlan Stenn, 20:08
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Harlan Stenn, 20:02
  • Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?, Robert Collins, 20:01
  • Re: top-level Makefile required?, Robert Collins, 19:58
  • top-level Makefile required?, Harlan Stenn, 19:55
  • Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?, Harlan Stenn, 19:50
  • [����] 3���� �𿩵� .., HP119, 19:35
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:41
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Ladislav Strojil, 11:28
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:04
  • (���α���) ���� ���������� ���ο�ȭ���Դϴ�.--�̼����� ����Ұ�, �̾�, 10:34
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Ladislav Strojil, 09:53
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 07:44
  • testing with .so and other questions, Waldemar Rosenbach, 07:41
  • You Gotta See This !!, kathy, 06:20
  • Little Pinks Getting Wet!, gary, 06:19
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Ladislav Strojil, 01:47
• August 01, 2002
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available and the version numbering issue, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:51
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 17:48
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Ladislav Strojil, 14:13
  • Re: how to disable ylwrap?, akim, 14:09
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available and the version numbering issue, Eric Siegerman, 13:57
  • Re: how to disable ylwrap?, John Millaway, 12:22
  • Re: how to disable ylwrap?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 12:08
  • Re: Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 11:48
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available and the version numbering issue, Respond To List Only, 11:47
  • how to disable ylwrap?, John Millaway, 11:41
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available and the version numbering issue, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 10:44
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available and the version numbering issue, Respond To List Only, 10:17
  • Beginner: a simple question about shared libraries, Ladislav Strojil, 09:39
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available., Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 09:04
  • Re: Automake 1.6b available., Bob Ham, 08:48
  • 2004 DV Green Card Lottery Dates, info, 07:51
  • [ȫ��]GIS ���ᱳ���ȳ�, �ѱ�GIS���̹�����, 02:54
  • Re: Pathalogical behavior with "more" AM_CONDITIONAL()s?, Robert Collins, 02:37

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc