[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -rm -f core.$pid
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: -rm -f core.$pid |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Feb 2003 10:40:28 -0800 |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> What do people thinks about Automake's removal of core dumps?
>
> I tend to think it's a misfeature.
Only 'cuz it's implemented for the wrong target.
> For one thing, this doesn't match the documentation.
> Quizz: which of the following targets do you think
> Automake is using to clear `core' files?
>
> | * If `make' built it, and it is commonly something that one would
> | want to rebuild (for instance, a `.o' file), then `mostlyclean'
> | should delete it.
> |
> | * Otherwise, if `make' built it, then `clean' should delete it.
> |
> | * If `configure' built it, then `distclean' should delete it
> |
> | * If the maintainer built it, then `maintainer-clean' should delete
> | it.
Since none of these steps intentionally caused its creation,
it cannot directly follow such a policy. So, it would seem
to me reasonable to pick one and:
> Nhgbznxr pyrnaf pber svyrf qhevat va gur zbfgylpyrna gnetrg.
This is the wrong answer. I would say, "make clobber", but
GNU didn't choose to use that long standing name, so there's
"make distclean" that is a close parallel. Something should
do it without it being too easy to "accidentally" remove evidence
of failures.
Cheers - Bruce