[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: automake & flex's -P option
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: automake & flex's -P option |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 06:03:55 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I don't think this is the right track, since flex and bison now
> generate more that just one file. Relying on something like -o is
> saner, but stdout is a dead end.
yacc & clones generate two files, lex one - unless you're referring to
some nonstandard usage that doesn't come to mind. In that case, there's
no reason to rely on %option.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/03
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/13
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/03/17
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Akim Demaille, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Richard Dawe, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Earnie Boyd, 2003/03/18
- Re: automake & flex's -P option, Thomas E. Dickey, 2003/03/18