[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: readme-alpha option and .90 pretests
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: readme-alpha option and .90 pretests |
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jun 2003 19:15:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
[Moved from address@hidden
>>> "Karl" == Karl Berry <address@hidden> writes:
Karl> Hello Alexandre and all,
Karl> rms has decreed that pretest version numbers, say for a
Karl> forthcoming version 4.6, should have the form 4.5.90, or
Karl> the form 4.6.YYYYMMDD. See the Test Releases node of
Karl> maintain.texi.
Karl> So, for automake's purposes, I suggest that the
Karl> readme-alpha option only consider the release an "alpha"
Karl> release if the tertiary version is >90, not simply if it
Karl> exists.
Hi Karl, sorry for the delay.
The numbering scheme described in the documentation for the
readme-alpha option (which is also enabled by the gnits option)
comes from the Gnits standards.
Maybe we should have a way to tell Automake about the version
numbering scheme used by a package?
Karl> Did anyone ever make a test release with a version number like 4.5.1?
Coreutils.
[...]
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: readme-alpha option and .90 pretests,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=