[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: nodist => CLEANFILES, no?

From: Martin Frydl
Subject: Re: nodist => CLEANFILES, no?
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 15:41:36 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030314

Akim Demaille wrote:
 > Earnie Boyd wrote:
 >> Akim Demaille wrote:
>> >>> > On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 02:02:25PM +0200, Akim Demaille wrote:
 >>> >>  >> Why wouldn't nodist_ stuff be automatically included into
>>> >>> > I think it would make sense. >>> >>> > >>> >>> I would love this. The only issue is where to bind the
 >>> cleaning. DISTCLEAN or CLEAN :(
>>> >> Me thinks, DISTCLEAN the better choice.

 > Me too, since sometimes nodist_ files are created by configure, not make.

Actually, this does not fit my needs, since my files are "make" files,
not "configure" files.

But how about making automake even smarter?

1. AC_CONFIG_FILES etc. are to be DISTCLEANED (aren't they already?)
2. nodist_ and target of a rule => CLEAN

What if the file is in both? I have package-config file which is generated by configure (AC_CONFIG_FILES) and then installed via nodist_bin_SCRIPTS. IMHO package-config should not be removed by make clean.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]