[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: distribution signatures
From: |
Harlan Stenn |
Subject: |
Re: distribution signatures |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jul 2003 22:35:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) XEmacs/21.1 (patch 12) (Channel Islands) (i386--freebsd) |
Thanks, that's a good start.
I don't want to manually add a line to a Makefile.am if automake can
responsibly do it for me, and given that automake knows if I'm making a
tar.gz file, a tar.Z file, a shar file, a zip file, a bz2 file, ... then it
can also easily genarate signature rules for those cases.
I think...
H
--
> --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:45:09AM -0400, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > I'm trying to find a way to have automake generate Makefiles that will
> > automatically generate digital signatures for distributions, and trying to
> > figure out a good way to handle it.
>
> Not quite what you asked, but I just add this to my top-level Makefile.am:
>
> sign:
> gpg --detach-sign $(distdir).tar.gz
> md5sum $(distdir).tar.gz | gpg --clearsign > $(distdir).tar.gz.md5sum
>
> Then you make dist and/or distcheck as normal, and when you're ready
> to release, make sign.
>
> I don't see any particular reason why this is worth including in
> automake. It's trivial and will probably vary per project anyway.
>
> --=20
> .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
> : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
> `. `' | Imperial College,
> `- -><- | London, UK
>
> --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE/FW2tlpK98RSteX8RAt52AJ9KyzPzBhsWQaC5cLeD5Zu0qOmQRACggcuD
> oIfUldUEYbzK2jCNNVgHEMo=
> =Sooj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8--
>