Re: Building a Shared Library

[Alexandre Duret-Lutz]

>>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:

 Tim> Mainly a few minor language nits; 

Thanks a lot!

[...]

 >> with a message such as
 >> object `foo.lo' created both with libtool and without

 Tim> Shouldn't the message be that foo.$(OBJEXT) is created in both cases?
 Tim> The program never builds foo.lo, but it does build foo.$(OBJEXT)

Indeed.   I'm installing the following on HEAD and branch-1-7.

2003-07-30  Alexandre Duret-Lutz  <address@hidden>

        * automake.in (handle_single_transform_list): Complain about
        foo.$(OBJEXT) being created both with libtool and without, not
        about foo.lo.
        Report from Tim Van Holder.

Index: automake.in
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/automake/automake/automake.in,v
retrieving revision 1.1365.2.50
diff -u -r1.1365.2.50 automake.in
--- automake.in 24 Jul 2003 21:27:16 -0000      1.1365.2.50
+++ automake.in 30 Jul 2003 16:41:32 -0000
@@ -2580,7 +2580,7 @@
                != (COMPILE_LIBTOOL | COMPILE_ORDINARY))
            && $object_compilation_map{$comp_obj} != $comp_val)
          {
-           err_am "object `$object' created both with libtool and without";
+           err_am "object `$comp_obj' created both with libtool and without";
          }
        $object_compilation_map{$comp_obj} |= $comp_val;
 

-- 
Alexandre Duret-Lutz