[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailing list archives
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: mailing list archives |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:59:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <address@hidden> writes:
Thomas> On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> address@hidden is only archived at mail.gnu.org and
>> gmane.org. It is quite young so the mail.gnu.org archive is
>> complete, however I fear the day it will be cut.
Thomas> any idea what fraction of the archive is spam?
For address@hidden I've counted 8 spams in 2003.
I may have missed one or two, but this looks negligible (<1%).
If you were talking about all the archives in general I've no
idea. I guess it's probably worse on the bug lists since
they are advertised a lot. My favorite is the bug-automake
archive of 2002
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/bug-automake/2002/
at some point during the summer gnu.org activated spamassassin,
and that shows!
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: automake -vs- huge projects, (continued)
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/16
Message not availableRe: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/27
Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Thomas Fitzsimmons, 2003/12/30
Re: automake -vs- huge projects (1st patch), Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/12/30
Re: automake -vs- huge projects, Ralf Corsepius, 2003/12/18