[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:27:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> > Well, you can create and maintain a 'config.linuxdistro' on your own...
>
> Yes, and then code:
>
> ...
> cvo=`config.guess`
> case $cvo in
> *-*-linux-gnu)
> cvo=`config.linuxdistro`
> ;;
> esac
> ...
Yes. This is how it's meant.
> everywhere one would otherwise simply code:
>
> cvo=`config.guess`
This is too simple. It increases the temptation to use the distro's name,
instead of writing an autoconf test. I've already explained that this is
undesirable because it limits the freedom to fork a new distribution.
Bruno
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, (continued)
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Scott James Remnant, 2004/01/08
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Scott James Remnant, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bob Proulx, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/01/13
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Bruno Haible, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/14
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/14
Re: 1.8 and mkdir_p, Harlan Stenn, 2004/01/07