Re: AM_LDFLAGS vs. maude_la_LDFLAGS

[Akim Demaille]

>>> "adl" == Alexandre Duret-Lutz <address@hidden> writes:

 > Whether using libtcswigpy_la_LDFLAGS in addition to AM_LDFLAGS is
 > an error I don't know.

It is not nice: (i) it is a different semantics than the other
variables, and (ii) the more common semantics is more flexible.

 > OTOH, the current behavior of AM_LDFLAGS vs. maude_LDFLAGS
 > sounds very counterintuitive to me.  Even if it breaks some
 > package, I'd rather fix this to match the handling of the other
 > flag variables than document and carry over this exception.

100% agreed.

Nice patch, many thanks!