[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CCing list replies (was: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: CCing list replies (was: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?) |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:54:58 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
In this case I looked at the list of people in the discussion, knew
they were all subscribed, and intentionally mailed only to the list. ;-)
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:
> > This is not addressed at me, but I also had to learn the hard way
> > that
> > - some gnu.org lists but not all automatically exclude subscribers if
> > they are listed in To: or Cc:.
>
> This is customizable, see the mailman options page.
However, that feature does not work well. It was designed to allow
cross-posting to several mailing lists and to avoid sending a
subscriber of multiple lists the same message. That part works.
[Basically crossposting to several different mailing lists is
problematic and should be avoided in general.]
This feature is bad for people like me that file mailing lists into
separate folders. I would only get one copy in one of the folders in
that case. (I think crossposting to -announce and -devel is good, for
a counter example. No discussion should happen on -announce.)
But the feature does not work at all if I am on the To: list and
subscribed both. In that case I would not get the copy from the
mailing list. In that case I would fail to file the message into the
appropriate folder because it would lacking the mailing list headers.
I think it is a bad mailing list feature.
Bob
- Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Meussen Erik IT415, 2005/01/13
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/01/13
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Thomas Dickey, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Bob Proulx, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Robert Collins, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Andrew Suffield, 2005/01/16
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Robert Collins, 2005/01/17
- Re: Configuring automake says autoconf 2.58 or higher needed. Have au toconf 2.59 installed. What is/goes wrong?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/01/17