[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: back to directory dependencies
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: back to directory dependencies |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jun 2005 08:53:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:14:03AM CEST:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>
> >>But I have another problem with SUBDIRS. As I mentioned in the previous
> >>thread, specifying -j starts building of l1 and src1 in parallel. l1
> >>lasts longer, and src1 fails due to missing l1. So I think I really need
> >>dependencies rather than sequence. What do you think?
> >
> >Which `make' does that? I can't seem to get GNU make to do so.
> >(If it's GNU make, the quick'n'dirty solution would be to add
> >.NOTPARALLEL:
> >to the toplevel Makefile.am. But that helps only for GNU make.)
>
> Note that he said `-j', not `-j 2', or `-j 8'. Without an argument -j
> is something close to infinite parallelism so it should indeed start
> considering the next directory as well.
ECANNOTREPRODUCE. Which GNU make version?
Over here GNU make-3.80 does _not_ parallelize across SUBDIRs.
Regards,
Ralf
- back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/10
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/29