[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: back to directory dependencies
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: back to directory dependencies |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:03:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 08:46:53PM CEST:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 06:31:57PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > Hmm. I don't know whether AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS can give you the
> > flexibility you want here. If you unconditionally build both packages,
> > there is no need to check for libl1 during src1/configure.
>
> The problem is, I have to check the location of the library. The system
> can be built in two ways:
>
> 1. libl1.a in ../lib/l1, native or cross.
>
> 2. libl1.a somewhere else (like /usr/lib or /usr/<platform>/lib), native
> or cross.
Hmm. How about you allow for a switch to tell the package you are doing
(1). For example: --enable-included-libl1. You may pass this to the
top package configure, it will pass it through.
Then have the sub-configure skip the test for libl1 in that case.
Agreed, it's not a great solution. Better suggestions welcome.
Regards,
Ralf
- Re: back to directory dependencies, (continued)
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/10
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies,
Ralf Wildenhues <=