[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-recursive automake advice?
From: |
tom fogal |
Subject: |
Re: non-recursive automake advice? |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:41:01 -0400 |
*mutter*, forgot to cc the list again...
------- Forwarded Message
From: tom fogal <address@hidden>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: non-recursive automake advice?
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:29:09 CDT."
<address@hidden>
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden> <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:40:14 -0400
Sender: address@hidden
<address@hidden>Bob Friesenhahn writes:
>On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Tom Tromey wrote:
>
>>>>>>> "tom" == tom fogal <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
>> tom> library, and then have /src/Makefile.am link all of those modules'
>> tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all of them.
>>
>> Do you really want each separate convenience library, or is that just
>> inertia? I ask because if you don't want separate ones, the task
>> becomes even simpler.
>
>This is a very good point. Convenience libraries are really an
Nah, not really. I just recently learned about the 'create a
convenience archive from a set of other convenience archives' feature
and got a little giddy with newfound toys.
Your arguments are convincing, I will switch my setup away from
convenience archives.
Thanks!
- -tom
------- End of Forwarded Message