Hi Thomas,
* Thomas Dickey wrote on Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:54:33AM CET:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
AC_DEFINE([foo], [bar baz])
The "new" syntax is backward-compatible to the dark ages, and should
have been, had it not been for the lazyness of the people in the dark
ages, used and promoted from day one.
actually it is not (being kind, one must assume that you're aware that is
an oversimplification). It is "mostly" compatible, but not backward
compatible.
This is news to me, I had previously thought this to be backward
compatible in any possible way. Could you be bothered to explain
in which way it fails this? Pointers welcome.