[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNU Make Extensions
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: GNU Make Extensions |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Dec 2008 20:56:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* NightStrike wrote on Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 04:46:28PM CET:
> Shouldn't the onus be on me, as the project maintainer, to accept that
> risk and craft the wildcards properly? I for one would wager heavily
> that the probability of that being a problem is FAR less than the
> current problems of maintaining the source file list. Doing it
> manually has already proven so error-prone as to cause significant
> lost time.
I don't understand. You let some script generate a fragment file that
is include'd by a Makefile.am file and lists all files to be distributed
or installed. The script gets run by a make rule when appropriate.
Problem solved, no?
The only downside I see is that you need to run automake during
development, which is something many projects do anyway.
Cheers,
Ralf
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, (continued)
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Duft Markus, 2008/12/11
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/11
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/12
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/12
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/16
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, NightStrike, 2008/12/16
- RE: GNU Make Extensions, Duft Markus, 2008/12/16
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/12/21
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/12/16
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Tom Tromey, 2008/12/16
- Re: GNU Make Extensions,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: GNU Make Extensions, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/12/10
Re: GNU Make Extensions, Christopher Sean Morrison, 2008/12/10