[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: invoke pkg-config with --static
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: invoke pkg-config with --static |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2009 19:53:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Lorenzo Bettini wrote on Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:48:49PM CEST:
> No I meant: if additional libraries are shown when building with shared
> library enable, this should do no harm, shouldn't it?
>
> In such case, one could simply not use .Private specification in .pc file.
D'oh. Yes, I guess you're right, and I'm just too darn good at
misparsing your replies repeatedly. Sorry about that.
Of course, as soon as you propose your software for packaging at
debian.org, they will count not using .Private as bug ... ;-)
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, (continued)
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/05/16
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Robert Collins, 2009/05/16
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/17
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/17
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/17
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/17
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/17
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/19
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/22
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/23
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Robert Collins, 2009/05/23
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Lorenzo Bettini, 2009/05/23
- Re: invoke pkg-config with --static, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/05/25