[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:17:05 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, Peter Johansson wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It is not necessary to specify top_builddir because that is where the
Makefile is written and the directory where the build is performed. As you
say, specifying $(top_srcdir) may cause harm since it is likely to break
VPATH builds.
Sorry, I thought we were dealing with a Makefile.am in a subdir, in other
words, a Makefile.am for which top_builddir does not equal `.'.
Ahhh, I see. Apparently some people still do that. In this case your
advice is good advice.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, (continued)
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, aaragon, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, aaragon, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Peter Johansson, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Peter Johansson, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, aaragon, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory, Peter Johansson, 2009/06/09
- Re: running tests under in a tests/ directory,
Bob Friesenhahn <=