[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Extended test suites
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Extended test suites |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Aug 2009 10:23:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-09) |
[ removed subscriber-only list from Cc: ]
Hello Mike,
please don't top-post, and please lower the wrap column a bit, thank
you.
* Mike Zraly wrote on Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:17:48PM CEST:
> (Hmm, if a test is listed in both XFAIL and TESTS, does it get run
> once with an expectation of failure?)
A test needs to be listed in TESTS to be run, so yes. The variable to
list expected failures in is XFAIL_TESTS, however, not XFAIL.
> I don't think generating macro values at runtime is recommended
> though.
Not quite sure what you mean with this, but it sounds like you're
hinting at GNU make-specific functionality.
Cheers,
Ralf