[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: silent installs

From: Joakim Tjernlund
Subject: Re: silent installs
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 11:53:13 +0100

Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote on 2010/01/31 08:24:44:
> Hello,
> let me address one part of the issue here (for the moment let's
> ignore the separate libtool --mode=install verbosity issue):
> * Alfred M. Szmidt wrote on Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 05:47:40PM CET:
> > You don't need that much programming skills to fix this, infact, all
> > the scaffolding is in place.  Take a look in automake/lib/am/
> > and automake/lib/am/, and the %SILENT% macro; you'd need to
> > replace occurences of `echo' with a variable (since we cannot just use
> > @ to silence the rules), that expands to either : (though, I think
> > "INSTALL file" would be nicer than complete silence) or echo depending
> > on if are using V=0 or V=1.
> Thinking about this a bit more, I don't really see the advantage here.
> You propose to replace, upon silent-rules and --enable-silent-rules,
> outputs like
>   /usr/bin/install -m 644 file /usr/local/share/foo/file
> with
>   INSTALL   file
> right?

Not quite, I am asking that make -s should not print
anything for the install part because these are not errors.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]