[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Creating a partial library
From: |
Steffen Dettmer |
Subject: |
Re: Creating a partial library |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:50:14 +0100 |
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 8:33 AM, John Calcote <address@hidden> wrote:
> (PIC-based static only) library is to use the "noinst" prefix. But libtool
> can be used to manually install a convenience library, so you could use
> libtool to do this in an install-exec-local rule in the Makefile.am file
> that builds (for instance) libhello.a (untested):
>
> install-exec-local:
> libtool --mode=install ./install-sh -c libhello.a
> $(DESTDIR)$(lib)/libhello.a
>
> This example came from the libtool manual (modified slightly for Automake
> context).
ohh this is interesting. Isn't this breaking `make uninstall' and
thus `make distcheck'? Would it be possible (better/suited/correct)
to have some lib_LIBRARIES=libother.a with a custom build rule
that simply copies the file? Then make install/uninstall could
work, but maybe this breaks other things?
oki,
Steffen
Re: Creating a partial library, Andrew W. Nosenko, 2010/02/03