[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dist-xz compression level

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: dist-xz compression level
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:42:16 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28)

Hello Andreas,

* Andreas Jellinghaus wrote on Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 09:37:13PM CEST:
> isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9?
> maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used,
> as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in
> that many bytes saved.

Well, does somebody have numbers (memory, time, compression) as to what
is reasonable?

> is the compression level configureable somehow?

Not ATM, but if necessary we could change that.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]