[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dist-xz compression level

From: Pavel Sanda
Subject: Re: dist-xz compression level
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 21:44:07 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

> isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9?
> maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used,
> as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in
> that many bytes saved.

Compared to the total time of make dist its IMHO
acceptable. But configurability won't hurt of course.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]