[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Patrick M. Rutkowski
Subject: Re: check_PROGRAMS & LDADD
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:55:28 -0400

Good question. At this very moment, no, there aren't any other programs.

But there might potentially be other programs in the future. And I'd
still really love to know if there's less blanket-cover way to do it
than the global LDADD. I'd really love to know just out of pure
curiosity even.


On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 4:17 PM, NightStrike <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:01 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello Patrick,
>> * Patrick Rutkowski wrote on Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:26:52AM CEST:
>>> test_avl_avl_iter_test_LDADD    = -lquark
>>> test_avl_avl_test_LDADD         = -lquark
>>> test_unicode_unicode_test_LDADD = -lquark
>>> ===========================================
>>> As the collection of tests grows it's going to get annoying to have to
>>> add an _LDADD entry for every single one separately. Is it possible to
>>> add an _LDADD for all check_PROGRAMS items in one blow?
>> All *_PROGRAMS that don't have an *_LDADD override use plain LDADD:
>> LDADD = -lquark
> Is there any _PROGRAM that isn't a check_PROGRAM?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]