automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES


From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: Augment instead of replace maude_DEPENDENCIES
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:36:50 +0900

Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
>   - For programs and libraries, automake now detects
> EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES and
>     adds them to the normal list of dependencies, but without
> overwriting the
>     foo_DEPENDENCIES variable, which is normally computed by automake.

Hmm, is there a convention about whether to use names like
"EXTRA_foo_DEPENDENCIES" vs. "foo_EXTRA_DEPENDENCIES"?

I would have guessed the latter, as it seems more consistent (and a bit
prettier)...

-Miles

-- 
Consult, v.i. To seek another's disapproval of a course already decided on.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]