[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default -g ??!?
|
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
|
Subject: |
Re: default -g ??!? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:23:42 -0500 |
The reason why users are helpless without debugging symbols is if a
program crashes, all they can look at are the machine registers at the
state of the crash. This is completely useless for figuring out why
the program crashed, or getting help from another hacker to figure out
why it crashed.
- Re: default -g ??!?, (continued)
- Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 2010/11/21
- reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), MK, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Karl Berry, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Karl Berry, 2010/11/22
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, MK, 2010/11/23
- Re: default -g ??!?,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: default -g ??!?, Warren Young, 2010/11/22
- Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 2010/11/20
Re: default -g ??!?, Russell Shaw, 2010/11/20