[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:17:44 +0900 |
address@hidden (Karl Berry) writes:
> I personally would not have written it that way in the first place, but
> given that it is there now, I don't want to simply replace it with bland
> text, or occupy rms's time with it, either.
Yeah, I think there's nothing particularly offensive about that text,
but maybe it could be more explanatory -- it addresses an issue that
some people may not know about, so maybe it would be good to briefly
explain further?
-Miles
--
"Suppose He doesn't give a shit? Suppose there is a God but He
just doesn't give a shit?" [George Carlin]
- Re: default -g ??!?, (continued)
- Re: default -g ??!?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/11/20
- Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 2010/11/20
- Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 2010/11/20
- Re: default -g ??!?, MK, 2010/11/21
- reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), MK, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Miles Bader, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, John Calcote, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping (was: default -g ??!?), Karl Berry, 2010/11/21
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, Karl Berry, 2010/11/22
- Re: reword documentation about symbol stripping, MK, 2010/11/23
- Re: default -g ??!?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/11/21
- Re: default -g ??!?, Warren Young, 2010/11/22
- Re: default -g ??!?, Miles Bader, 2010/11/20
Re: default -g ??!?, Russell Shaw, 2010/11/20