[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:18:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
Hello Ralf and all GNU hackers.
On Monday 07 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
>
> 1) Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) (or maybe another
> test protocol?). Automake-generated Makefiles could be consumers of the
> protocol for third-party testsuites. Automake-generated simple
> testsuites (TESTS) and Autoconf-generated Autotest testsuites could be
> producers.
>
FYI, you can find (unofficial?) specifications and documentation for the
TAP format here:
<http://search.cpan.org/~petdance/Test-Harness-2.64/lib/Test/Harness/TAP.pod>
Regards,
Stefano
- Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas,
Stefano Lattarini <=
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Russ Allbery, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Harlan Stenn, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/03/10