[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 14:57:44 +1300 |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
>
> 1) Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) (or maybe another
> test protocol?). Automake-generated Makefiles could be consumers of the
> protocol for third-party testsuites. Automake-generated simple
> testsuites (TESTS) and Autoconf-generated Autotest testsuites could be
> producers.
>
> This project would entail both investigating the possible advantages
> of either step, prototyping an implementation, and getting it ready
> to merge into the code. Each step on its own would already be useful
> on its own, and small enough to be completed within the given time
> frame.
I've mentioned subunit before - its similar to TAP but slightly more
structured and capable of handling binary attachments and so on.
-Rob
- Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Russ Allbery, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas,
Robert Collins <=
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Harlan Stenn, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/03/10
- Automake GSoC idea, Daniel Herring, 2011/03/09
- Re: Automake GSoC idea, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/11