[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Autotools GSoC ideas |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2011 20:19:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hi Robert,
* Robert Collins wrote on Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 02:57:44AM CET:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I'll throw a couple of suggestions for Autotools out there:
> >
> > 1) Interfacing with the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) (or maybe another
> > test protocol?).
> I've mentioned subunit before - its similar to TAP but slightly more
> structured and capable of handling binary attachments and so on.
Right, I forgot about the name, _again_. Thanks for reminding me.
So let's extend the suggestion to include evaluating the best protocol
(or set of protocols) to use/interface to.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Russ Allbery, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 2011/03/07
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Robert Collins, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/08
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Stefano Lattarini, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, Harlan Stenn, 2011/03/09
- Re: Autotools GSoC ideas, olafBuddenhagen, 2011/03/10
- Automake GSoC idea, Daniel Herring, 2011/03/09
- Re: Automake GSoC idea, Ralf Wildenhues, 2011/03/11