[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rfc] Antimake
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [rfc] Antimake |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:54:00 +0100 |
Hi Marko.
On 03/09/2012 11:26 PM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>
> Antimake is my attempt to fix "no good build system" problem -
> GNU Make library, but instead inventing custom conventions,
> it implements Automake syntax.
>
JFTR, we've recently started a (low-priority) fork of Automake aimed at
taking more advantage of GNU make features, with the hope of simplifying
Automake and make it more manageable for both users and maintainers:
<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/automake-ng>
<http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=automake.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/ng/master>
Can I ask with what license are you distributing your project? If it's
GPL-compatible, I'd be very happy to re-use some your code in Automake-NG
(assuming they are not too radically different) ...
Anyway, I'm glad I'm not the only one interested in the "let's just require
GNU make and live happily" approach!
> Example:
>
> bin_PROGRAMS = hello
> hello_SOURCES = hello.c
> include antimake.mk
>
> After writing such Makefile, you can run 'make' immediately,
> no need for ./configure or Makefile rebuild.
>
> Links
> -----
>
> Doc: http://libusual.github.com/mk/antimake.html
> Demos: http://libusual.github.com/mk/
> Source: https://github.com/libusual/libusual/blob/master/mk/antimake.mk
> GIT: git://github.com/libusual/libusual.git
>
> Comments, flames?
>
I will surely take a better look when I have more time.
Regards,
Stefano
- [rfc] Antimake, Marko Kreen, 2012/03/09
- Re: [rfc] Antimake,
Stefano Lattarini <=