Re: dealing with executable shell scripts

[NightStrike]

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2012年3月21日8:33 NightStrike <address@hidden>:
>>> "bin_SCRIPTS" doesn't actually seem to do much of anything -- you
>>> still have to add your own rules to handle all the actual work, need
>>> to fiddle with EXTRA_DIST and CLEANFILES, etc.  Indeed, doing what I
>>
>> You can avoid hacking EXTRA_DIST if you change your primary from:
>>
>> bin_SCRIPTS = aaa
>> to:
>> dist_bin_SCRIPTS = aaa
>
> That's going to distribute "aaa", though, right, not the actual
> "source" e.g. aaa.sh?

Yes.  There's an earlier email in this thread from somebody
illustrating that you don't need to morph from source to script if the
file doesn't actually get changed.