|
From: | Russ Allbery |
Subject: | Re: dealing with executable shell scripts |
Date: | Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:08:37 -0700 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
Miles Bader <address@hidden> writes: > [Relying on source-code execute bits always being correctly maintained > is one of those things that ... well... doesn't really feel very robust. > I dunno, maybe it's just me...] Doesn't every package with a configure script rely on this? I suppose that people could chmod +x the configure script before running it, but I've never had to do that. -- Russ Allbery (address@hidden) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |