Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG

automake

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG

From:	Diego Elio Pettenò
Subject:	Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG
Date:	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:29:04 -0700
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120720 Thunderbird/14.0

On 21/08/2012 09:47, Eric Blake wrote:
>  The
> 'silent-rules' change in automake change did NOT make more builds
> instantly silent, nor are we preventing you from your goal of noisy
> builds for the Fedora buildbots. 

That being the case I retire my note as well — although it seems like
most upstreams just decide to enable silent rules for good when they do.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
address@hidden — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), (continued)

Prev by Date: Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG
Next by Date: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG
Previous by thread: Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG
Next by thread: Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread