Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

automake (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Aug 26 2012 07:26:42 -0400 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/22
  • Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/23
    • Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/23
      • The future of Automake-NG (was: Re: [Automake-NG] typo whitelisting, and Automake-NG vs. GNU make runtime), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/23
• Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Jeffrey Walton, 2012/08/21
  • Re: Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Robert Boehne, 2012/08/21
    • Re: Cannot Create Executables (configure and -fPIC/-pic), Jeffrey Walton, 2012/08/21
• Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
  • Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
    • Automake vs. Automake-NG (was: Re: [PATCH] build: support and require Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES) (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Andrew W. Nosenko, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Eric Blake, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [PATCH] {master} compile: remove support for $(INCLUDES), Eric Blake, 2012/08/22
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Ralf Corsepius, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Eric Blake, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Russ Allbery, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/21
      • [PATCH] news: about pattern rules and old-style suffix rules (was: Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/22
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/21
      • Re: [Automake-NG] Automake vs. Automake-NG, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/21
      • Re: Automake vs. Automake-NG, Paolo Bonzini, 2012/08/22
• Automake, Autoconf and POSIX shells (was: Re: GraphicsMagick Automake TAP), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/19
  • Re: Automake, Autoconf and POSIX shells (was: Re: GraphicsMagick Automake TAP), Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/19
• not running a make rule if distcheck is called, Vincent Torri, 2012/08/19
  • Re: not running a make rule if distcheck is called, Nick Bowler, 2012/08/20
• How to automatically get missing files when changing configure.ac?, Jeff Johnston, 2012/08/17
  • Could the --add-missing option be supported in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE? (was: Re: How to automatically get missing files when changing configure.ac?), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/17
    • Re: Could the --add-missing option be supported in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE?, Jeff Johnston, 2012/08/17
• Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 2012/08/15
  • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Diego Elio Pettenò, 2012/08/15
    • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/15
      • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Russ Allbery, 2012/08/15
    • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 2012/08/15
      • Message not available
      • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 2012/08/22
      • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/22
      • Re: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 2012/08/23
  • RE: Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, John Calcote, 2012/08/15
  • Using convenience libraries with non-recursive make, Del Merritt, 2012/08/15
• Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/14
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/14
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/14
    • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake (was: Re: Automake 1.12.0b test release), Roger Leigh, 2012/08/15
  • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Miles Bader, 2012/08/15
    • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/15
      • Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake, Robert Boehne, 2012/08/15
  • [PATCH] {master} AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE: allow obsolescent two-args invocation once again (was: Re: Dynamic package version numbers with Autoconf and Automake), Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/24
    • Re: [PATCH] {master} AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE: allow obsolescent two-args invocation once again, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/26
• v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Eric Blake, 2012/08/14
  • Re: v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/14
    • Re: v1.11.6 tag missing from automake.git?, Eric Blake, 2012/08/14
• GNU Automake 1.12.3 released, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/14
  • Re: GNU Automake 1.12.3 released, Richard Stallman, 2012/08/15
• using cygpath for compiling and linking, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/08/07
  • Re: using cygpath for compiling and linking, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/07
    • Re: using cygpath for compiling and linking, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2012/08/08
• distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Peter Johansson, 2012/08/06
  • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Eric Blake, 2012/08/06
    • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Peter Johansson, 2012/08/06
    • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 2012/08/07
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Miles Bader, 2012/08/07
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 2012/08/07
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Miles Bader, 2012/08/07
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 2012/08/07
    • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/07
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Ralf Corsepius, 2012/08/08
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/09
      • Re: distinguish automake 1.11 from 1.12+ at autoconf time, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/10
• [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Marcelo Zimbres, 2012/08/04
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/08/04
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/05
  • Re: [Automake] How to get debug symbols in the executable?, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/08/05
• parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/01
  • Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/02
    • Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Jim Meyering, 2012/08/02
      • [SOLVED] Re: parallel "make check" output lines are lost!?!, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/08/02

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc