Re: Static library naming

[Stefano Lattarini]

[Dropping Automake-NG list, from the next reply]

On 09/24/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>
> [MEGA-SNIP]
> 
> Yes, because I don't want this to be Automake-NG only. But since
> this scheme is opt-in, the compile script "must" be adjusted to
> handle libhello.a anyway. And with an adjusted compile script, I
> suppose the acceptable level of ugliness elsewhere is lowered, as
> it only fixes the (mostly) cosmetic naming problem.
>
So, if I understand correctly, you're saying that at this point it's
better and simpler to just adjust the 'compile' script?  Or am I
misunderstanding? (in which case, sorry to be so dense!)

Thanks,
  Stefano