[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST"
From: |
Matthias Paulmier |
Subject: |
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST" |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:15:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) |
Mathieu Lirzin <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello Matthias,
>
> Matthias Paulmier <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I put up the first draft for my proposal here :
>> <matthias.paulmier.emi.u-bordeaux.fr/proposal.pdf>.
>
> I think this is a good first draft.
>
> A few comments:
>
> - For the “Project” and “Plan” parts, feel free to expand on the
> functional and non-functional requirements, based on previous
> discussion (for example the fact that the AST will probably have a
> coarse grain) and from your personal intuition. It doesn't matter if
> your intuition doesn't match with what I have in mind, it will just be
> a good occasion to discuss the project in more details.
I've added a "Requirements" subsection to the "Project" part. It may be
lacking some things I didn't think of or forgot about.
> - Regarding the example script deliverable, I think you can precise that
> a set of examples that can be manually tested will be provided. If it
> helps you and fit your workflow (for example if you want to do TDD or
> similar), you can add some automated unit tests however this is not a
> requirement.
That has been added. As for TDD, I'm not an expert on that but some
tests may be provided during the summer as part of the test suite under
the t/ directory.
> - For the documentation, this doesn't have a high priority. I will be
> happy with just some basic docstrings specifying the functional
> contract of subroutines.
Ok. I let documentation as a general term with that in mind.
>> The communication part still needs to be discussed. As for the plan tell me
>> what
>> you think.
>
> Regarding the communication. For the weekly status update and
> discussion, if that's OK with you I would rather have a VOIP one on one
> conversation (via Ring or Jitsi) when possible and use email as a
> fallback or complement. Regarding the instantaneous communication IRC
> is convenient for me.
Sounds good to me. I put Jitsi in the proposal since it doesn't need
registration and I don't have a Ring ID ATM. But I don't have a real
preference.
My draft is online on the GSoC website since it was open on Monday. I
don't know if you have access to that.
Thanks for the feedback.
--
Matthias Paulmier
Re: [GSoC] Proposal for "Parse Makefile.am using an AST", Kip Warner, 2018/03/05