[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] grrr, what am I doing wrong ???
From: |
Lee Mitchell |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] grrr, what am I doing wrong ??? |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Feb 2001 16:57:23 -0000 |
woohoo !!
thanks, that worked :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Carl Wall <address@hidden>
To: Lee Mitchell <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] grrr, what am I doing wrong ???
> Hi Lee
>
> Have you removed any dos enviourment variables from your
c:\autoeexec.bat
> file, that where in there for the old avr-gcc. There is a warning about
this
> on the www.avrfreeks.net avrgcc install page, about doing this for any
> reinstalls or upgrades. About a week ago I did an install on an NT4 box
and
> it worked, do not know if the file has changed since I did it. Before I
> did it, I erased the existing avr-gcc file directory.
>
> When you get it up and going there is also an updated make file on
> avrfreeks.net with some workarounds for this release of avr-gcc, you might
> want to download that, it is a modified Volker make file.
> Carl
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 11:35:41AM -0000, Lee Mitchell wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I have previously been using a quite old version of avr-gcc. Now,
before
> > i start work on a new project, i decided to upgrade my tools to the
latest
> > version.
> > I downloaded the avrgcc20010211.exe file and ran it installing the tools
in
> > c:\avrgcc
> >
> > However, when I try and build the libraries by runing the install
program in
> > c:\avrgcc
> > I get the following errors and the libraries are not compiled.
> > I am using Windows 95 and have tried to install the tools on 2 machines
> > (both win95) and have had the same failure on both machines.
> >
> > Any help would be greatly appreciated as I am due to start writing code
> > within the next few weeks !
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Lee Mitchell
> >
>
> --
> Carl A. Wall VE3APY Toronto, Ontario, Canada
> "Created on DEBIAN 2.2, an alternative to Microsoft Systems
> and a GNU/Linux distribution of Open Source programming"