[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] libc.a & fread
From: |
Christoph Plattner |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] libc.a & fread |
Date: |
Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:13:43 +0200 |
You are right. Those functions are not supported.
Why ? The answer is very simple. We have a standalone
controller without any file system and without device
drivers for console, etc....
So those calls cannot be present.
I am working on a OS for a longer time now (months by
month I have no time to continue), but my OS should
become open source.
The point of my OS in contrast to others:
I want to have a standard POSIX conform interface AND
and real socket interface, so that the programming
model is similar to Linux and other UNIX systems !
Of course, it will be only a subset of all functions.
But it includes multitasking, of course, and a
protocol stack for LAN!
Christoph P.
Dick Ginther wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theodore A. Roth [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: September 29, 2002 11:36 AM
> To: E. Weddington
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] openavr site (was RE: RPM packages)
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, E. Weddington wrote:
>
> :)On 24 Sep 2002 at 11:15, Theodore A. Roth wrote:
> :)
> :)>
> :)>
> :)> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002, Egil Kvaleberg wrote:
> :)>
> :)> :) Wouldn't it be a good idea to have this on the various AVR
> :)> :) documentation resources out there - it would presumably save a lot
> :)> :) of duplicated effort! I could not find anything - that is why I
> :)> :) made the RPMs in the first place.
> :)>
> :)> Yes, it would. We've been trying to centralize a lot of the
> :)> documentation into the avr-libc package. There's still a need for
> :)> having a single jumping off point for getting started with avr and gnu
> :)> tools.
> :)>
> :)
> :)I'm all for a single jumping off point for the GNU AVR toolset! ;-)
> Hi,
> I am a newbie to the arv-gcc community. I have
> got avr-gcc3.2 and I am using to compile some linux apps
> to compare the amount of code space the atmega128 uses
> compared to a x86.
> I'm having trouble finding library utilities like
> fread, fopen, fwrite, etc. Perhaps these are not supported
> and not in the libc.a library?
> Thanks.
> avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
--
-------------------------------------------------------
private: address@hidden
company: address@hidden
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org